VIP(R)-304K USA(304800-999)
の編集
Top
/
VIP(R)-304K USA(304800-999)
[
トップ
] [
編集
|
差分
|
バックアップ
|
添付
|
リロード
] [
新規
|
一覧
|
検索
|
最終更新
|
ヘルプ
]
-- 雛形とするページ --
(no template pages)
[[VIPR翻訳]] EVT304800N;The US Purchase of Alaska;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304800D;In 1867, US Secretary of State William Seward purchased Alaska from the Russian Empire for $7 million.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304800A;Buy Alaska;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304801N;Florida Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304801D;The territory of Florida has applied to join the Union as a state. The people of Florida support slavery. Should Florida enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304802N;Iowa Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304802D;The territory of Iowa has applied to join the Union as a state. Iowa is almost entirely free soil. Should Iowa enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304803N;Oklahoma Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304803D;The territory of Oklahoma has applied to join the Union as a state. The people of Oklahoma support slavery. Should Oklahoma enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304804N;Michigan Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304804D;The territory of Michigan has applied to join the Union as a state. Michigan is almost entirely free soil. Should Michigan enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304805N;Minnesota Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304805D;The territory of Minnesota has applied to join the Union as a state. Minnesota is almost entirely free soil. Should Minnesota enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304806N;Wisconsin Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304806D;The territory of Wisconsin has applied to join the Union as a state. Wisconsin is almost entirely free soil. Should Wisconsin enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304807N;North Dakota Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304807D;The territory of North Dakota has applied to join the Union as a state. North Dakota is almost entirely free soil. Should North Dakota enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304808N;South Dakota Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304808D;The territory of South Dakota has applied to join the Union as a state. South Dakota is almost entirely free soil. Should South Dakota enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304809N;Repeal the Missouri Compromise?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304809D;The slavery faction in Congress wants to nullify the Missouri Compromise of 1820 by allowing popular vote to decide whether a new territory is slave or free. This will allow slavery to expand anywhere that US territory exists. This would greatly please the slave faction but infuriate New England.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304809A;The Missouri Compromise stands;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304809B;Repeal the Missouri Compromise;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304810N;Cuba Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304811N;Arkansas Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304812N;Missouri Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304813N;Kansas Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304814N;Florida Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304815N;Georgia Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304816N;Kentucky Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304817N;Louisiana Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304818N;Mississippi Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304819N;North Carolina Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304820N;Tennessee Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304821N;Virginia Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304822N;Oklahoma Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304822D;Chief Stand Watie has led the Cherokee Nation in the Indian Territory of Oklahoma to join the Confederate States of America.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304823N;Texas Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304824N;Arizona Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304825N;New Mexico Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304826N;California Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304827N;Colorado Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304828N;Idaho Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304829N;Montana Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304830N;Nevada Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304831N;Oregon Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304832N;Utah Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304833N;Washington Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304834N;Alaska Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304835N;Alaska Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304835D;The territory of Alaska has applied to join the Union as a state. Alaska is almost entirely free soil. Should Alaska enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304836N;Northwest Territory Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304837N;The Northwest Territory Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304837D;The Northwest Territory has applied to join the Union as a state. The Northwest Territory is almost entirely free soil. Should Northwest Territory enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304838N;New Brunswick Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304839N;New Brunswick Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304839D;New Brunswick has applied to join the Union as a state. New Brunswick is almost entirely free soil. New England is already protesting the chance that it may become a slave state. Should New Brunswick enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304840N;Nova Scotia Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304841N;Nova Scotia Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304841D;Nova Scotia has applied to join the Union as a state. Nova Scotia is almost entirely free soil. New England is already protesting the chance that it may become a slave state. Should Nova Scotia enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304842N;Ontario Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304843N;Ontario Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304843D;Ontario has applied to join the Union as a state. Ontario is almost entirely free soil. The Midwestern free states and New England are already protesting the chance that it may become a slave state. Should Ontario enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304844N;Quebec Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304845N;Quebec Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304845D;Quebec has applied to join the Union as a state. Quebec is almost entirely free soil. The Midwestern free states and New England are already protesting the chance that it may become a slave state. Should Quebec enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304846N;Alberta Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304847N;Alberta Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304847D;Alberta has applied to join the Union as a state. Alberta is almost entirely free soil. The Midwestern free states and New England are already protesting the chance that it may become a slave state. Should Alberta enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304848N;British Columbia Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304849N;British Columbia Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304849D;British Columbia has applied to join the Union as a state. British Columbia is almost entirely free soil. Should British Columbia enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304850N;Manitoba Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304851N;Manitoba Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304851D;Manitoba has applied to join the Union as a state. Manitoba is almost entirely free soil. Should Manitoba enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304852N;Saskatchewan Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304853N;Saskatchewan Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304853D;Saskatchewan has applied to join the Union as a state. Saskatchewan is almost entirely free soil. Should Saskatchewan enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304854N;Quebec Declares Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304854D;Disgusted with the slavery question and a weak Federal government, the Quebec Legislature has voted to declare its independence.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304855N;Canada Declares Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304855D;Disgusted with the slavery question and a weak Federal government, the Canadian Legislature has voted to declare independence.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304856N;The British West Indies Secede;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304857N;The British West Indies Apply to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304857D;The British West Indies have applied to join the Union as a state. The people of The British West Indies support slavery. Should The British West Indies enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304859N;The Danish West Indies Secede;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304860N;The Danish West Indies Apply to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304860D;The Danish West Indies have applied to join the Union as a state. The people of The Danish West Indies support slavery. Should The Danish West Indies enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304861N;Curacao Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304862N;Curacao Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304862D;Curacao has applied to join the Union as a state. The people of Curacao support slavery. Should Curacao enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304863N;The French West Indies Secede;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304864N;The French Indies Apply to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304864D;The French West Indies have applied to join the Union as a state. The people of The French West Indies support slavery. Should The French West Indies enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304865N;Chihuahua Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304866N;Chihuahua Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304866D;Chihuahua has applied to join the Union as a state. Many people in Chihuahua favor slavery and the South is lobbying for Chihuahua to become a slave state. Should Chihuahua enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304867N;Durango Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304868N;Durango Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304868D;Durango has applied to join the Union as a state. Many people in Durango favor slavery and the South is lobbying to for Durango to become a slave state. Should it enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304869N;California Declares Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304869D;California nationalists, disgusted with the slavery debate and a weak, vacillating government, have declared their independence from the United States and have formed the Bear Flag Republic.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304870N;Utah Declares Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304870D;The Mormons in Utah, disgusted with the slavery debate and a weak, vacillating government, have declared their independence from the United States and formed the Republic of Deseret.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304871N;New England Declares Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304871D;Isolated by the growth of the slave faction in Congress and frustrated by their failure to halt the spread of slavery into the new states, the legislatures of New England, as a body, have declared themselves independent.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304872N;Iowa Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304873N;Michigan Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304874N;Minnesota Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304875N;Wisconsin Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304876N;North Dakota Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304877N;South Dakota Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304878N;Sonora Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304879N;Sonora Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304879D;Sonora has applied to join the Union as a state. Many people in Sonora support slavery and the South is lobbying for Sonora to become a slave state. Should Sonora enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304880N;Cuba Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304880D;Cuba has applied to join the Union as a state. Cuba is strongly pro-slavery and the South is lobbying for Cuba to become a slave state. Should Cuba enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304881N;Nuevo Leon Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304882N;Nuevo Leon Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304882D;Nuevo Leon has applied to join the Union as a state. Many people in Nuevo Leon support slavery and the South is lobbying for Nuevo Leon to become a slave state. Should Nuevo Leon enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304883N;Washington Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304883D;The territory of Washington has applied to join the Union as a state. Washington is almost entirely free soil. Should Washington enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT334884N;Oregon Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304884D;The territory of Oregon has applied to join the Union as a state. Oregon is almost entirely free soil. Should Oregon enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304885N;Texas Applies for US Statehood;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304885D;The government of Texas has applied for admission as a state. The majority of Texans believe in slavery. Should Texas be join the Union as a slave or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304891N;Arizona Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304891D;The territory of Arizona has applied to join the Union as a state. Arizona is sparcely populated with a mix of pro-slave and free soilers. Should Arizona enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304892N;New Mexico Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304892D;The territory of New Mexico has applied to join the Union as a state. New Mexico is sparcely populated with a mix of pro-slave and free soilers. Should New Mexico become a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304893N;Alabama Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304895N;Texas Applies for US Statehood;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304895D;The territory of Texas has applied for to join the Union as a state. The people of Texas support slavery and the South is lobbying for Texas to become a slave state. Should Texas enter as a slave or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304899N;The Slavery Issue;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304899D;The issue of slavery had long been a point of contention in the United States, even before the American Revolution. By the early 19th Century, the issue threatened the Union's existance, with pro-slavery 'firebrands' in South Carolina defending the institution against New England 'abolitionists.';;;;;;;;;;X ACT304899A;The great debate begins;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304901N;The Purchase of Baja by California;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304901D;California purchased Baja despite our having made it clear that the government of the United States would consider such a purchase inadvisable.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304902N;Texas Seeks Formal Recognition;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304902D;Despite diplomatic dealings with the United States, Texas was not immediately granted formal recognition by the USA. Recognition of independence and annexation were pursued separately by Texas, since it seemed that formal recognition might make membership in the Union follow more easily. Texas secured U.S. recognition in March 1837, and President Jackson appointed Alcee LeBranch as charge d'affaires.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304902A;Recognize Texas;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304902B;No dealings with slaveholders;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304903N;Texas Applies for Early Statehood;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304903D;In August 1837, Texas annexation was formally presented to the United States. Public opinion, expressed in memorials and petitions, favored annexation by the time Congress convened. Politicians declined to take action for months, however, and John Quincy Adams carried on an effective delaying action by speaking against it every day for three weeks. The session closed in the summer of 1838 without action.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304903A;Do not anger Mexico;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304903B;Make them a State of the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304905N;Political Realignments;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304905D;The end of slavery has caused major changes in the political platforms of the Republican and Democratic parties - mainly the demise of the slavery issue.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304905A;A new vision for a new day;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304910N;Sale of the Danish Virgin Islands to the US;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304910D;Following a request from the US to sell the Danish Virgin Islands an advisory election was held and in 1917 Denmark sold the Islands for cash.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304910A;Send offer;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304911N;Denmark Refuses;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304911D;Historically Denmark accepted the US offer but it might have happened that Denmark had refused either because the price was too low or that more jingoistic feelings was dominant at the time.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304912D;Following a request from the US to sell the islands an advisory election was held and in 1917 Scandanavia sold the Islands for cash.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304913N;Scandanavia Refuses;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304913D;Historically Scandanavia accepted the US offer but it might have happened that Scandanavia had refused either because the price was too low or that more jingoistic feelings was dominant at the time.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304914N;Native American Land Cessions - The End Of Nez Perce Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304914D;As white settlment proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1876 the Blackfeet nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southern Alberta to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304915N;New Brunswick - American Reaction;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304915D;New England is trying to lure New Brunswick into leaving the Union!;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304915A;Protest this meddling;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304915B;We will not tolerate this;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304915C;Let New Brunswick go;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304917N;Nova Scotia - American Reaction;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304917D;New England is trying to lure Nova Scotia into leaving the Union!;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304917C;Let Nova Scotia go;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304919N;Quebec - American Reaction;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304917D;New England is trying to lure Quebec into leaving the Union!;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304919C;Let Quebec go;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304921N;Native American Land Cessions - Western Lower Michigan;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304921D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1836 the Ottawa and Chippewa nations signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Western Lower Michigan to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304922N;Native American Land Cessions - Northern Wisconsin;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304922D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1876 the Chippewa nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northern Wisconsin to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304923N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Wisconsin;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304923D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1837 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Wisconsin to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304924N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern Iowa;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304924D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1837 the Sauk and Fox nations signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Iowa to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304925N;Native American Land Cessions - Northern Michigan;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304925D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1837 the Sauk and Fox nations signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Iowa to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304926N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Iowa;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304926D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1842 the Sauk and Fox nations signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Iowa to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304927N;Native American Land Cessions - Eastern Kansas;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304927D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1846 the Kansas nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Eastern Kansas to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304928N;Native American Land Cessions - Southeastern Minnesota;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304928D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1851 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeastern Minnesota to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304929N;Native American Land Cessions - Northeastern California;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304929D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1851 the Paiute nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northeastern California to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304930N;Native American Land Cessions - Eastern Nebraska;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304930D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1854 the Omaha nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Eastern Nebraska to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304931N;Native American Land Cessions - East Central Minnesota;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304931D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1854 the Chippewa nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in East Central Minnesota to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304932N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern Oregon;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304932D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1855 the Calapooia nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Oregon to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304933N;Native American Land Cessions - Western Washington;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304933D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1855 the Saquamish nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Western Washington to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304934N;Native American Land Cessions - Northern Minnesota;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304934D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1855 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northern Minnesota to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304935N;Native American Land Cessions - Northeastern Oregon;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304935D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1855 the Wasco nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northeastern Oregon to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304936N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern Montana;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304936D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1855 the Flathead nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Montana to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304937N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Oregon;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304937D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1855 the Rouge River nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Oregon to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304938N;Native American Land Cessions - Southeastern South Dakota;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304938D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1858 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeastern South Dakota to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304939N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern Kansas & Eastern Colorado;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304939D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1861 the Arapahoe nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Kansas & Eastern Colorado to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304940N;Native American Land Cessions - Southeastern Utah;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304940D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1861 the Ute nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeastern Utah to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304941N;Native American Land Cessions - Northern Idaho;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304941D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1863 the Nez Perce nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northern Idaho to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304942N;Native American Land Cessions - Northeastern Nevada;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304942D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1863 the Shoshone nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northeastern Nevada to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304943N;Native American Land Cessions - Southeastern Oregon;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304943D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1864 the Madok nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeastern Oregon to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304944N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Idaho;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304944D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1864 the Klamath nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Idaho to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304945N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Kansas;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304945D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1865 the Osage nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Kansas to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304946N;Native American Land Cessions - Southeastern Wyoming;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304946D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1865 the Chyenne nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeastern Wyoming to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304947N;Native American Land Cessions - Northeastern Dakotas;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304947D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1867 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in the Northeastern Dakotas to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304948N;Native American Land Cessions - Texas Panhandle;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304948D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1867 the Kiowa and Comanche nations signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in the Texas Panhandle to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304949N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern Colorado;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304949D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1868 the Ute nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Colorado to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304950N;Native American Land Cessions - Western Nebraska;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304950D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1868 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Western Nebraska to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304951N;Native American Land Cessions - Southeastern Montana;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304951D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1868 the Crow nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeastern Montana to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304952N;Native American Land Cessions - Northeastern Arizona;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304952D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1868 the Navajo nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northeastern Arizona to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304953N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Idaho;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304953D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1864 the Klamath nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Idaho to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304954N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern North Dakota;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304954D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1870 the Mandan nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern North Dakota to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304955N;Native American Land Cessions - Southern New Mexico and Western Texas;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304955D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1873 the Comanch nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeern New Mexico and Western Texas to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304956N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Montana;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304956D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1873 the Blackfoot nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Montana to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304957N;Native American Land Cessions - Eastern Washington;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304957D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1873 the Nez Perce nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Eastern Washington to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304958N;Native American Land Cessions - The Paiute Cession;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304958D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1874 the Paiute nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in California, Nevada and Utah to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304959N;Native American Land Cessions - South Central California;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304959D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1874 the Apache nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in South Central California to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304960N;Native American Land Cessions - Northeastern Montana;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304960D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1874 the Blackfoot nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northeastern Montana to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304961N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Colorado;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304961D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1874 the Ute nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Colorado to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304962N;Native American Land Cessions - Northern Wyoming;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304962D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1876 the Chyenne nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northern Wyoming to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304963N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern South Dakota;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304963D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1876 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern South Dakota to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304964N;Native American Land Cessions - Central Arizona;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304964D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1879 the Pima nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Central Arizona to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304965N;Native American Land Cessions - The End of Sioux Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304965D;During the Nineteenth Century white expansion into Western North America has led to the transfer of Native American land to the US government and the establishment of the reservation system for native peoples. In 1882 the Sioux of Southwestern South Dakota signed a treaty that effectively ended their free control of the last region of territory around the Black Hills, considered sacred by the Sioux. An era in the history of the American West was ending.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304966N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern Arizona;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304966D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1883 the Walapia nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Arizona to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304967N;Native American Land Cessions - The End of Apache Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304967D;During the Nineteenth Century white expansion into Western North America has led to the transfer of Native American land to the US government and the establishment of the reservation system for native peoples. In 1883 the Yuma of Southern Arizona signed a treaty that effectively ended their free control of the last region of territory held by Southwestern Native Americans. An era in the history of the American West was ending.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304968N;Native American Land Cessions - Indian Territory Becomes Oklahoma;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304968D;Indian Territory was meant to be a permanent reserve for Native Americans. In March 1889 a bill passed the US Congress opening the Indian Territory to white settlement, effective on 18 April. Some settlers could not wait, crossing the border early and establishing claims to the best land, creating the Sooners to whom people of Oklahoma are now nicknamed.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304969N;Native American Land Cessions - The Cherokee Strip Ends Cherokee Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304969D;After the opening of Indian Territory to white settlement in 1889, Native Americans still retained control of what is now the Oklahoma panhandle which remained off limits to white settlement. By 1893 the demands to open what was called the Cherokee Strip led to Congressional action and a land run in September 1893, effectively ending direct Native control of their last territory in the continental United States.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304970N;Native American Land Cessions - Anvil Creek Gold Rush;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304970D;After the purchase of Alaska American interest was confined to the southern coastal region, but the discovery of gold in the Yukon stimulated similar activity in native-controlled areas of Alaska. In July 1898 gold was discovered at Anvil Creek near Nome, leading to a rush that led to the loss of native access to traditional lands.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304970A;Assume authority over the region;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304971N;Native American Land Cessions - Northern Alaska;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304971D;After the purchase of Alaska American interest was confined to the southern coastal region, but the discovery of gold in Central Alaska stimulated American interest in Northern Alaska to ensure secure American control. In 1901 the Inupiat nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northern Alaska to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304972N;Native American Land Cessions - Tanana River Gold Rush;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304972D;After the purchase of Alaska American interest was confined to the southern coastal region, but the discovery of gold in the Yukon stimulated similar activity in native-controlled areas of Alaska. In June 1902 gold was discovered along the Tanana River in Central Alaska, leading to a rush that led to the loss of native access to traditional lands.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304973N;Deseret Becomes a US Territory;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304973D;After the Mormon migration, Mormon leaders sent delegations to Washington requesting Deseret be allowed entry into the USA as a full state. This was rejected, but Brigham Young, the Mormon leader, was appointed territorial governor charged with enforcing American law in the Salt Lake Basin.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304973A;They can be a territory, but not a state;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304973B;Grant full statehood;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304973C;We don't want their kind in our nation;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304974N;Sioux Resistance in the Wake of American Conquest;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304974D;The process of American conquest of the West was a long, piecemeal process limited by the level of transportation and communication as well as other concerns of the American government. Had the USA attempted a rapid military conquest of Native lands, its ability to hold the territory would have been tenuous at best.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304974A;Resistance to American rule is rapidly growing;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304975N;Utah's Final Statehood Petition;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304975D;After six previous attempts to gain statehood were rejected due to issued of economic development, the relationship between church and state in the territory and the polygamy issue, in 1895 a new constitution was passed in Utah that met all federal demands for admission to the union. The result would be a final, successful application for statehood that would be granted in late 1895, with admission to the Union on 4 January 1896.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304975A;Utah is now the 45th State to enter the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304976N;Restoring Authority Over the Apache;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304976D;With Mexican influence removed from Alta California and New Mexico, the United States would replace Mexico as the dominant power over the nations of the American Southwest;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304977N;Nez Perce Resistance in the Wake of American Conquest;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304977D;The process of American conquest of the West was a long, piecemeal process limited by the level of transportation and communication as well as other concerns of the American government. Had the USA attempted a rapid military conquest of Native lands, its ability to hold the territory would have been tenuous at best.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304978N;Cherokee Resistance in the Wake of American Conquest;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304979N;Apache Resistance in the Wake of American Conquest;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304980N;Cree Resistance in the Wake of American Conquest;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304981N;Return of Cherokee Lands at the End of the Mexican War;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304981D;With the successful end of conflict between the USA and Mexico, the Cherokee expect the return of the lands temproarily ceded to the USA for military access.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304981A;Return the lands as per agreement;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304981B;We will keep the lands;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304985N;The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304985D;We have soundly beaten the Mexicans. We will offer peace, demanding their northern territories be ceded to the United States. In return we will pay fifteen million dollars indemnity.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304985A;Offer them peace;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304985B;We want more!;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304986N;America And The Hermit Kingdom;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304986D;The American government made several attempts to force Korea open to American trade. In 1866 the USS General Sherman was sunk in Korean waters when it approached too close to shore. Repeated attempts to gain information on the attack from the Korean government failed and some have argued the USA should force Korea to end its policy of isolation, much as was done in Japan in 1853.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304986A;Send A Naval Squadron To Open Korea;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304986B;Korea Is Of Little Concern To Us;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304987N;Korea Resists American Demands;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304987D;As part of the mission to end Korean isolationism, in June 1871 an American squadron attempted to force the Kanghwa narrows outside Seoul, but was attacked by Korean defenses. This led to a firefight and in face of fierce Korean resistance the American squadron withdrew. How should we respond to this provocation?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304988N;Korean-American Treaty of Peace, Amity, Commerce and Navigation;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304988D;With Korea opening itself to international trade, Americans in Seoul came to believe that the United States needed to formalize its relationship and rights in Korea to ensure it would not be potentially excluded by another great power from access to Korea.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304988A;Offer Treaty To The Koreans;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304989D;The British government has requested a conference to be held to discuss the problems of Morocco. The Moroccan government wishes to eliminate the practice of protection of local agents by Western powers, and is willing to offer concessions to secure its goals. The United States has long-standing trade relations with Morocco and should we not attend, our access to Morocco's markets could be hampered.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304993N;フロンティアの消滅;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304993D;「マニフェスト・デスティニー」の時代から数十年が経った。幌馬車も、\n駆け出しの入植地も、金銀発見のゴールドラッシュも、そして時折\n起こった先住民との戦いすらも、文明化が進むにつれて記憶の\n片隅へとかすんでいった。こうした時代を経て最終的に西部にも\n文明の光が当たり、フロンティアは過去の思い出となったのだ。;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304993A;西部を勝ち取ったぞ;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304994N;自由土地党と共和党の連立;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304994D;1850年代になると共和党が台頭してきた。奴隷制廃止論の旗印を\n掲げる共和党がアメリカ政治に立ち現れてきたことで、自由土地党の\nような主張の似た政党は、活気あふれるこの新党へと合流することと\nなった。こうして奴隷制廃止論者の大義はより高められるようになった\nのである。;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304995N;派閥危機が解消へ;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304995D;合衆国の政界を襲った未曾有の大危機が乗り越えられると、抗争の\nあり方も徐々に危機的状態を脱して、再び普通の民主政治で行われ\nるそれへと戻っていった。派閥主義的な土台に立った政党は、これから\n次第に雲散霧消していくことになる。;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304997N;The Kansas-Nebraska Act;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304997D;The Repeal of the Missouri Compromise has created a major political firestorm. Should we allow the people of the states to decide their alignment or force legislation in order to maintain the peace?;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304997A;Decide by popular vote;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304997B;Make them slave states;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304997C;Make them free soil;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304998N;The Second Compromise;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304998D;Historically, this event was called The Compromise of 1850. It determined the basis for the admission of California, New Mexico and Arizona, and their alignment as slave or free states upon admission to the Union.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304998A;Compromise;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304998B;Arizona, New Mexico and California will be slave states;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304998C;Arizona, New Mexico and California will be free States;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304999N;South Carolina Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304999D;The slow isolation of the Southern slave faction by the growing Abolitionist movement has led the legislature of South Carolina to declare itself independent. They are calling on other slave states to join them in a new nation, the Confederate States of America.;;;;;;;;;;X
タイムスタンプを変更しない
[[VIPR翻訳]] EVT304800N;The US Purchase of Alaska;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304800D;In 1867, US Secretary of State William Seward purchased Alaska from the Russian Empire for $7 million.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304800A;Buy Alaska;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304801N;Florida Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304801D;The territory of Florida has applied to join the Union as a state. The people of Florida support slavery. Should Florida enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304802N;Iowa Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304802D;The territory of Iowa has applied to join the Union as a state. Iowa is almost entirely free soil. Should Iowa enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304803N;Oklahoma Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304803D;The territory of Oklahoma has applied to join the Union as a state. The people of Oklahoma support slavery. Should Oklahoma enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304804N;Michigan Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304804D;The territory of Michigan has applied to join the Union as a state. Michigan is almost entirely free soil. Should Michigan enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304805N;Minnesota Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304805D;The territory of Minnesota has applied to join the Union as a state. Minnesota is almost entirely free soil. Should Minnesota enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304806N;Wisconsin Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304806D;The territory of Wisconsin has applied to join the Union as a state. Wisconsin is almost entirely free soil. Should Wisconsin enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304807N;North Dakota Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304807D;The territory of North Dakota has applied to join the Union as a state. North Dakota is almost entirely free soil. Should North Dakota enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304808N;South Dakota Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304808D;The territory of South Dakota has applied to join the Union as a state. South Dakota is almost entirely free soil. Should South Dakota enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304809N;Repeal the Missouri Compromise?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304809D;The slavery faction in Congress wants to nullify the Missouri Compromise of 1820 by allowing popular vote to decide whether a new territory is slave or free. This will allow slavery to expand anywhere that US territory exists. This would greatly please the slave faction but infuriate New England.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304809A;The Missouri Compromise stands;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304809B;Repeal the Missouri Compromise;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304810N;Cuba Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304811N;Arkansas Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304812N;Missouri Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304813N;Kansas Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304814N;Florida Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304815N;Georgia Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304816N;Kentucky Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304817N;Louisiana Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304818N;Mississippi Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304819N;North Carolina Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304820N;Tennessee Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304821N;Virginia Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304822N;Oklahoma Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304822D;Chief Stand Watie has led the Cherokee Nation in the Indian Territory of Oklahoma to join the Confederate States of America.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304823N;Texas Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304824N;Arizona Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304825N;New Mexico Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304826N;California Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304827N;Colorado Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304828N;Idaho Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304829N;Montana Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304830N;Nevada Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304831N;Oregon Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304832N;Utah Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304833N;Washington Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304834N;Alaska Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304835N;Alaska Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304835D;The territory of Alaska has applied to join the Union as a state. Alaska is almost entirely free soil. Should Alaska enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304836N;Northwest Territory Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304837N;The Northwest Territory Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304837D;The Northwest Territory has applied to join the Union as a state. The Northwest Territory is almost entirely free soil. Should Northwest Territory enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304838N;New Brunswick Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304839N;New Brunswick Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304839D;New Brunswick has applied to join the Union as a state. New Brunswick is almost entirely free soil. New England is already protesting the chance that it may become a slave state. Should New Brunswick enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304840N;Nova Scotia Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304841N;Nova Scotia Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304841D;Nova Scotia has applied to join the Union as a state. Nova Scotia is almost entirely free soil. New England is already protesting the chance that it may become a slave state. Should Nova Scotia enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304842N;Ontario Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304843N;Ontario Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304843D;Ontario has applied to join the Union as a state. Ontario is almost entirely free soil. The Midwestern free states and New England are already protesting the chance that it may become a slave state. Should Ontario enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304844N;Quebec Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304845N;Quebec Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304845D;Quebec has applied to join the Union as a state. Quebec is almost entirely free soil. The Midwestern free states and New England are already protesting the chance that it may become a slave state. Should Quebec enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304846N;Alberta Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304847N;Alberta Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304847D;Alberta has applied to join the Union as a state. Alberta is almost entirely free soil. The Midwestern free states and New England are already protesting the chance that it may become a slave state. Should Alberta enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304848N;British Columbia Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304849N;British Columbia Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304849D;British Columbia has applied to join the Union as a state. British Columbia is almost entirely free soil. Should British Columbia enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304850N;Manitoba Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304851N;Manitoba Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304851D;Manitoba has applied to join the Union as a state. Manitoba is almost entirely free soil. Should Manitoba enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304852N;Saskatchewan Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304853N;Saskatchewan Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304853D;Saskatchewan has applied to join the Union as a state. Saskatchewan is almost entirely free soil. Should Saskatchewan enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304854N;Quebec Declares Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304854D;Disgusted with the slavery question and a weak Federal government, the Quebec Legislature has voted to declare its independence.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304855N;Canada Declares Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304855D;Disgusted with the slavery question and a weak Federal government, the Canadian Legislature has voted to declare independence.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304856N;The British West Indies Secede;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304857N;The British West Indies Apply to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304857D;The British West Indies have applied to join the Union as a state. The people of The British West Indies support slavery. Should The British West Indies enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304859N;The Danish West Indies Secede;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304860N;The Danish West Indies Apply to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304860D;The Danish West Indies have applied to join the Union as a state. The people of The Danish West Indies support slavery. Should The Danish West Indies enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304861N;Curacao Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304862N;Curacao Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304862D;Curacao has applied to join the Union as a state. The people of Curacao support slavery. Should Curacao enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304863N;The French West Indies Secede;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304864N;The French Indies Apply to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304864D;The French West Indies have applied to join the Union as a state. The people of The French West Indies support slavery. Should The French West Indies enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304865N;Chihuahua Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304866N;Chihuahua Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304866D;Chihuahua has applied to join the Union as a state. Many people in Chihuahua favor slavery and the South is lobbying for Chihuahua to become a slave state. Should Chihuahua enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304867N;Durango Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304868N;Durango Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304868D;Durango has applied to join the Union as a state. Many people in Durango favor slavery and the South is lobbying to for Durango to become a slave state. Should it enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304869N;California Declares Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304869D;California nationalists, disgusted with the slavery debate and a weak, vacillating government, have declared their independence from the United States and have formed the Bear Flag Republic.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304870N;Utah Declares Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304870D;The Mormons in Utah, disgusted with the slavery debate and a weak, vacillating government, have declared their independence from the United States and formed the Republic of Deseret.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304871N;New England Declares Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304871D;Isolated by the growth of the slave faction in Congress and frustrated by their failure to halt the spread of slavery into the new states, the legislatures of New England, as a body, have declared themselves independent.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304872N;Iowa Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304873N;Michigan Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304874N;Minnesota Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304875N;Wisconsin Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304876N;North Dakota Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304877N;South Dakota Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304878N;Sonora Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304879N;Sonora Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304879D;Sonora has applied to join the Union as a state. Many people in Sonora support slavery and the South is lobbying for Sonora to become a slave state. Should Sonora enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304880N;Cuba Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304880D;Cuba has applied to join the Union as a state. Cuba is strongly pro-slavery and the South is lobbying for Cuba to become a slave state. Should Cuba enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304881N;Nuevo Leon Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304882N;Nuevo Leon Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304882D;Nuevo Leon has applied to join the Union as a state. Many people in Nuevo Leon support slavery and the South is lobbying for Nuevo Leon to become a slave state. Should Nuevo Leon enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304883N;Washington Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304883D;The territory of Washington has applied to join the Union as a state. Washington is almost entirely free soil. Should Washington enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT334884N;Oregon Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304884D;The territory of Oregon has applied to join the Union as a state. Oregon is almost entirely free soil. Should Oregon enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304885N;Texas Applies for US Statehood;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304885D;The government of Texas has applied for admission as a state. The majority of Texans believe in slavery. Should Texas be join the Union as a slave or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304891N;Arizona Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304891D;The territory of Arizona has applied to join the Union as a state. Arizona is sparcely populated with a mix of pro-slave and free soilers. Should Arizona enter as a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304892N;New Mexico Applies to Join the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304892D;The territory of New Mexico has applied to join the Union as a state. New Mexico is sparcely populated with a mix of pro-slave and free soilers. Should New Mexico become a slave state or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304893N;Alabama Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304895N;Texas Applies for US Statehood;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304895D;The territory of Texas has applied for to join the Union as a state. The people of Texas support slavery and the South is lobbying for Texas to become a slave state. Should Texas enter as a slave or free state?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304899N;The Slavery Issue;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304899D;The issue of slavery had long been a point of contention in the United States, even before the American Revolution. By the early 19th Century, the issue threatened the Union's existance, with pro-slavery 'firebrands' in South Carolina defending the institution against New England 'abolitionists.';;;;;;;;;;X ACT304899A;The great debate begins;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304901N;The Purchase of Baja by California;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304901D;California purchased Baja despite our having made it clear that the government of the United States would consider such a purchase inadvisable.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304902N;Texas Seeks Formal Recognition;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304902D;Despite diplomatic dealings with the United States, Texas was not immediately granted formal recognition by the USA. Recognition of independence and annexation were pursued separately by Texas, since it seemed that formal recognition might make membership in the Union follow more easily. Texas secured U.S. recognition in March 1837, and President Jackson appointed Alcee LeBranch as charge d'affaires.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304902A;Recognize Texas;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304902B;No dealings with slaveholders;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304903N;Texas Applies for Early Statehood;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304903D;In August 1837, Texas annexation was formally presented to the United States. Public opinion, expressed in memorials and petitions, favored annexation by the time Congress convened. Politicians declined to take action for months, however, and John Quincy Adams carried on an effective delaying action by speaking against it every day for three weeks. The session closed in the summer of 1838 without action.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304903A;Do not anger Mexico;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304903B;Make them a State of the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304905N;Political Realignments;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304905D;The end of slavery has caused major changes in the political platforms of the Republican and Democratic parties - mainly the demise of the slavery issue.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304905A;A new vision for a new day;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304910N;Sale of the Danish Virgin Islands to the US;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304910D;Following a request from the US to sell the Danish Virgin Islands an advisory election was held and in 1917 Denmark sold the Islands for cash.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304910A;Send offer;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304911N;Denmark Refuses;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304911D;Historically Denmark accepted the US offer but it might have happened that Denmark had refused either because the price was too low or that more jingoistic feelings was dominant at the time.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304912D;Following a request from the US to sell the islands an advisory election was held and in 1917 Scandanavia sold the Islands for cash.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304913N;Scandanavia Refuses;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304913D;Historically Scandanavia accepted the US offer but it might have happened that Scandanavia had refused either because the price was too low or that more jingoistic feelings was dominant at the time.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304914N;Native American Land Cessions - The End Of Nez Perce Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304914D;As white settlment proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1876 the Blackfeet nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southern Alberta to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304915N;New Brunswick - American Reaction;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304915D;New England is trying to lure New Brunswick into leaving the Union!;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304915A;Protest this meddling;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304915B;We will not tolerate this;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304915C;Let New Brunswick go;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304917N;Nova Scotia - American Reaction;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304917D;New England is trying to lure Nova Scotia into leaving the Union!;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304917C;Let Nova Scotia go;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304919N;Quebec - American Reaction;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304917D;New England is trying to lure Quebec into leaving the Union!;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304919C;Let Quebec go;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304921N;Native American Land Cessions - Western Lower Michigan;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304921D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1836 the Ottawa and Chippewa nations signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Western Lower Michigan to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304922N;Native American Land Cessions - Northern Wisconsin;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304922D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1876 the Chippewa nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northern Wisconsin to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304923N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Wisconsin;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304923D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1837 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Wisconsin to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304924N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern Iowa;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304924D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1837 the Sauk and Fox nations signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Iowa to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304925N;Native American Land Cessions - Northern Michigan;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304925D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1837 the Sauk and Fox nations signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Iowa to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304926N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Iowa;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304926D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1842 the Sauk and Fox nations signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Iowa to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304927N;Native American Land Cessions - Eastern Kansas;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304927D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1846 the Kansas nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Eastern Kansas to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304928N;Native American Land Cessions - Southeastern Minnesota;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304928D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1851 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeastern Minnesota to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304929N;Native American Land Cessions - Northeastern California;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304929D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1851 the Paiute nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northeastern California to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304930N;Native American Land Cessions - Eastern Nebraska;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304930D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1854 the Omaha nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Eastern Nebraska to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304931N;Native American Land Cessions - East Central Minnesota;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304931D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1854 the Chippewa nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in East Central Minnesota to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304932N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern Oregon;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304932D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1855 the Calapooia nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Oregon to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304933N;Native American Land Cessions - Western Washington;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304933D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1855 the Saquamish nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Western Washington to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304934N;Native American Land Cessions - Northern Minnesota;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304934D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1855 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northern Minnesota to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304935N;Native American Land Cessions - Northeastern Oregon;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304935D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1855 the Wasco nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northeastern Oregon to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304936N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern Montana;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304936D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1855 the Flathead nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Montana to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304937N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Oregon;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304937D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1855 the Rouge River nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Oregon to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304938N;Native American Land Cessions - Southeastern South Dakota;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304938D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1858 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeastern South Dakota to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304939N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern Kansas & Eastern Colorado;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304939D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1861 the Arapahoe nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Kansas & Eastern Colorado to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304940N;Native American Land Cessions - Southeastern Utah;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304940D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1861 the Ute nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeastern Utah to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304941N;Native American Land Cessions - Northern Idaho;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304941D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1863 the Nez Perce nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northern Idaho to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304942N;Native American Land Cessions - Northeastern Nevada;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304942D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1863 the Shoshone nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northeastern Nevada to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304943N;Native American Land Cessions - Southeastern Oregon;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304943D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1864 the Madok nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeastern Oregon to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304944N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Idaho;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304944D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1864 the Klamath nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Idaho to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304945N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Kansas;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304945D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1865 the Osage nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Kansas to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304946N;Native American Land Cessions - Southeastern Wyoming;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304946D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1865 the Chyenne nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeastern Wyoming to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304947N;Native American Land Cessions - Northeastern Dakotas;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304947D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1867 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in the Northeastern Dakotas to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304948N;Native American Land Cessions - Texas Panhandle;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304948D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1867 the Kiowa and Comanche nations signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in the Texas Panhandle to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304949N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern Colorado;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304949D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1868 the Ute nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Colorado to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304950N;Native American Land Cessions - Western Nebraska;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304950D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1868 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Western Nebraska to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304951N;Native American Land Cessions - Southeastern Montana;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304951D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1868 the Crow nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeastern Montana to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304952N;Native American Land Cessions - Northeastern Arizona;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304952D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1868 the Navajo nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northeastern Arizona to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304953N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Idaho;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304953D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1864 the Klamath nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Idaho to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304954N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern North Dakota;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304954D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1870 the Mandan nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern North Dakota to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304955N;Native American Land Cessions - Southern New Mexico and Western Texas;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304955D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1873 the Comanch nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southeern New Mexico and Western Texas to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304956N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Montana;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304956D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1873 the Blackfoot nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Montana to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304957N;Native American Land Cessions - Eastern Washington;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304957D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1873 the Nez Perce nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Eastern Washington to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304958N;Native American Land Cessions - The Paiute Cession;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304958D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1874 the Paiute nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in California, Nevada and Utah to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304959N;Native American Land Cessions - South Central California;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304959D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1874 the Apache nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in South Central California to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304960N;Native American Land Cessions - Northeastern Montana;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304960D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1874 the Blackfoot nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northeastern Montana to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304961N;Native American Land Cessions - Southwestern Colorado;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304961D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1874 the Ute nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Southwestern Colorado to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304962N;Native American Land Cessions - Northern Wyoming;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304962D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1876 the Chyenne nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northern Wyoming to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304963N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern South Dakota;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304963D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1876 the Sioux nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern South Dakota to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304964N;Native American Land Cessions - Central Arizona;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304964D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1879 the Pima nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Central Arizona to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304965N;Native American Land Cessions - The End of Sioux Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304965D;During the Nineteenth Century white expansion into Western North America has led to the transfer of Native American land to the US government and the establishment of the reservation system for native peoples. In 1882 the Sioux of Southwestern South Dakota signed a treaty that effectively ended their free control of the last region of territory around the Black Hills, considered sacred by the Sioux. An era in the history of the American West was ending.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304966N;Native American Land Cessions - Northwestern Arizona;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304966D;As white settlement proceeded westward, the US government moved to secure land from the Native American peoples for white settlement. In most cases treaties were negotiated in the presence of US military forces, resulting in small parcels of land being reserved for exclusive Native use and the balance ceded to the US government. In 1883 the Walapia nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northwestern Arizona to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304967N;Native American Land Cessions - The End of Apache Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304967D;During the Nineteenth Century white expansion into Western North America has led to the transfer of Native American land to the US government and the establishment of the reservation system for native peoples. In 1883 the Yuma of Southern Arizona signed a treaty that effectively ended their free control of the last region of territory held by Southwestern Native Americans. An era in the history of the American West was ending.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304968N;Native American Land Cessions - Indian Territory Becomes Oklahoma;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304968D;Indian Territory was meant to be a permanent reserve for Native Americans. In March 1889 a bill passed the US Congress opening the Indian Territory to white settlement, effective on 18 April. Some settlers could not wait, crossing the border early and establishing claims to the best land, creating the Sooners to whom people of Oklahoma are now nicknamed.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304969N;Native American Land Cessions - The Cherokee Strip Ends Cherokee Independence;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304969D;After the opening of Indian Territory to white settlement in 1889, Native Americans still retained control of what is now the Oklahoma panhandle which remained off limits to white settlement. By 1893 the demands to open what was called the Cherokee Strip led to Congressional action and a land run in September 1893, effectively ending direct Native control of their last territory in the continental United States.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304970N;Native American Land Cessions - Anvil Creek Gold Rush;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304970D;After the purchase of Alaska American interest was confined to the southern coastal region, but the discovery of gold in the Yukon stimulated similar activity in native-controlled areas of Alaska. In July 1898 gold was discovered at Anvil Creek near Nome, leading to a rush that led to the loss of native access to traditional lands.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304970A;Assume authority over the region;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304971N;Native American Land Cessions - Northern Alaska;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304971D;After the purchase of Alaska American interest was confined to the southern coastal region, but the discovery of gold in Central Alaska stimulated American interest in Northern Alaska to ensure secure American control. In 1901 the Inupiat nation signed a treaty turning over most of their traditional range in Northern Alaska to US control in exchange for reserved land.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304972N;Native American Land Cessions - Tanana River Gold Rush;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304972D;After the purchase of Alaska American interest was confined to the southern coastal region, but the discovery of gold in the Yukon stimulated similar activity in native-controlled areas of Alaska. In June 1902 gold was discovered along the Tanana River in Central Alaska, leading to a rush that led to the loss of native access to traditional lands.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304973N;Deseret Becomes a US Territory;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304973D;After the Mormon migration, Mormon leaders sent delegations to Washington requesting Deseret be allowed entry into the USA as a full state. This was rejected, but Brigham Young, the Mormon leader, was appointed territorial governor charged with enforcing American law in the Salt Lake Basin.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304973A;They can be a territory, but not a state;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304973B;Grant full statehood;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304973C;We don't want their kind in our nation;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304974N;Sioux Resistance in the Wake of American Conquest;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304974D;The process of American conquest of the West was a long, piecemeal process limited by the level of transportation and communication as well as other concerns of the American government. Had the USA attempted a rapid military conquest of Native lands, its ability to hold the territory would have been tenuous at best.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304974A;Resistance to American rule is rapidly growing;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304975N;Utah's Final Statehood Petition;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304975D;After six previous attempts to gain statehood were rejected due to issued of economic development, the relationship between church and state in the territory and the polygamy issue, in 1895 a new constitution was passed in Utah that met all federal demands for admission to the union. The result would be a final, successful application for statehood that would be granted in late 1895, with admission to the Union on 4 January 1896.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304975A;Utah is now the 45th State to enter the Union;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304976N;Restoring Authority Over the Apache;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304976D;With Mexican influence removed from Alta California and New Mexico, the United States would replace Mexico as the dominant power over the nations of the American Southwest;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304977N;Nez Perce Resistance in the Wake of American Conquest;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304977D;The process of American conquest of the West was a long, piecemeal process limited by the level of transportation and communication as well as other concerns of the American government. Had the USA attempted a rapid military conquest of Native lands, its ability to hold the territory would have been tenuous at best.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304978N;Cherokee Resistance in the Wake of American Conquest;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304979N;Apache Resistance in the Wake of American Conquest;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304980N;Cree Resistance in the Wake of American Conquest;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304981N;Return of Cherokee Lands at the End of the Mexican War;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304981D;With the successful end of conflict between the USA and Mexico, the Cherokee expect the return of the lands temproarily ceded to the USA for military access.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304981A;Return the lands as per agreement;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304981B;We will keep the lands;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304985N;The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304985D;We have soundly beaten the Mexicans. We will offer peace, demanding their northern territories be ceded to the United States. In return we will pay fifteen million dollars indemnity.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304985A;Offer them peace;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304985B;We want more!;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304986N;America And The Hermit Kingdom;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304986D;The American government made several attempts to force Korea open to American trade. In 1866 the USS General Sherman was sunk in Korean waters when it approached too close to shore. Repeated attempts to gain information on the attack from the Korean government failed and some have argued the USA should force Korea to end its policy of isolation, much as was done in Japan in 1853.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304986A;Send A Naval Squadron To Open Korea;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304986B;Korea Is Of Little Concern To Us;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304987N;Korea Resists American Demands;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304987D;As part of the mission to end Korean isolationism, in June 1871 an American squadron attempted to force the Kanghwa narrows outside Seoul, but was attacked by Korean defenses. This led to a firefight and in face of fierce Korean resistance the American squadron withdrew. How should we respond to this provocation?;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304988N;Korean-American Treaty of Peace, Amity, Commerce and Navigation;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304988D;With Korea opening itself to international trade, Americans in Seoul came to believe that the United States needed to formalize its relationship and rights in Korea to ensure it would not be potentially excluded by another great power from access to Korea.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304988A;Offer Treaty To The Koreans;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304989D;The British government has requested a conference to be held to discuss the problems of Morocco. The Moroccan government wishes to eliminate the practice of protection of local agents by Western powers, and is willing to offer concessions to secure its goals. The United States has long-standing trade relations with Morocco and should we not attend, our access to Morocco's markets could be hampered.;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304993N;フロンティアの消滅;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304993D;「マニフェスト・デスティニー」の時代から数十年が経った。幌馬車も、\n駆け出しの入植地も、金銀発見のゴールドラッシュも、そして時折\n起こった先住民との戦いすらも、文明化が進むにつれて記憶の\n片隅へとかすんでいった。こうした時代を経て最終的に西部にも\n文明の光が当たり、フロンティアは過去の思い出となったのだ。;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304993A;西部を勝ち取ったぞ;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304994N;自由土地党と共和党の連立;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304994D;1850年代になると共和党が台頭してきた。奴隷制廃止論の旗印を\n掲げる共和党がアメリカ政治に立ち現れてきたことで、自由土地党の\nような主張の似た政党は、活気あふれるこの新党へと合流することと\nなった。こうして奴隷制廃止論者の大義はより高められるようになった\nのである。;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304995N;派閥危機が解消へ;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304995D;合衆国の政界を襲った未曾有の大危機が乗り越えられると、抗争の\nあり方も徐々に危機的状態を脱して、再び普通の民主政治で行われ\nるそれへと戻っていった。派閥主義的な土台に立った政党は、これから\n次第に雲散霧消していくことになる。;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304997N;The Kansas-Nebraska Act;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304997D;The Repeal of the Missouri Compromise has created a major political firestorm. Should we allow the people of the states to decide their alignment or force legislation in order to maintain the peace?;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304997A;Decide by popular vote;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304997B;Make them slave states;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304997C;Make them free soil;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304998N;The Second Compromise;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304998D;Historically, this event was called The Compromise of 1850. It determined the basis for the admission of California, New Mexico and Arizona, and their alignment as slave or free states upon admission to the Union.;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304998A;Compromise;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304998B;Arizona, New Mexico and California will be slave states;;;;;;;;;;X ACT304998C;Arizona, New Mexico and California will be free States;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304999N;South Carolina Secedes;;;;;;;;;;X EVT304999D;The slow isolation of the Southern slave faction by the growing Abolitionist movement has led the legislature of South Carolina to declare itself independent. They are calling on other slave states to join them in a new nation, the Confederate States of America.;;;;;;;;;;X
テキスト整形のルールを表示する
